Non-invasive evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a clinical correlation study
Objectives : To determine the utility of ultrasonography (US)-derived parameters (e.g. prostate volume [PV], bladder wall thickness [BWT], post-void residual urine volume [PVR], and intravesical prostatic protrusion [IPP]) and uroflowmetry for identifying bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) by correlat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arab journal of urology 2019-10, Vol.17 (4), p.259-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
: To determine the utility of ultrasonography (US)-derived parameters (e.g. prostate volume [PV], bladder wall thickness [BWT], post-void residual urine volume [PVR], and intravesical prostatic protrusion [IPP]) and uroflowmetry for identifying bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) by correlating them with the results of pressure–flow urodynamic studies (UDS).
Patients and methods
: In all, 164 patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), from May 2016 to December 2018, were included in this study. All had International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Quality-of-Life (QOL) index, uroflowmetry (including maximum urinary flow rate [Q
max
]) and PVR measured by transabdominal US. Pressure–flow UDS were performed on all men and BOO was defined by a BOO Index (BOOI) >40. Men with a Q
max
of ≥12.0 mL/s were considered to have ‘good’ flow.
Results
: Amongst the 164 men, the mean (SD) age, PV, BWT and Q
max
were 66.72 (9.88) years, 51.91 (13.24) mm, 5.07 (0.91) mm, and 8.46 (3.59) mL/s, respectively. In all, 91 (55.49%) patients had BOO with a BOOI >40 and nine (5.49%) had equivocal BOO with a BOOI of 20–40. The IPP was a statistically significant predictor (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2090-5998 2090-598X 2090-5998 |
DOI: | 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1660071 |