Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI

Background Commercial low-field-strength MRI systems are generally not equipped with state-of-the-art MRI hardware, and are not suitable for demanding imaging techniques. An MRI system was developed that combines low field strength (0.55 T) with high-performance imaging technology. Purpose To evalua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2019-11, Vol.293 (2), p.384-393
Hauptverfasser: Campbell-Washburn, Adrienne E, Ramasawmy, Rajiv, Restivo, Matthew C, Bhattacharya, Ipshita, Basar, Burcu, Herzka, Daniel A, Hansen, Michael S, Rogers, Toby, Bandettini, W Patricia, McGuirt, Delaney R, Mancini, Christine, Grodzki, David, Schneider, Rainer, Majeed, Waqas, Bhat, Himanshu, Xue, Hui, Moss, Joel, Malayeri, Ashkan A, Jones, Elizabeth C, Koretsky, Alan P, Kellman, Peter, Chen, Marcus Y, Lederman, Robert J, Balaban, Robert S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Commercial low-field-strength MRI systems are generally not equipped with state-of-the-art MRI hardware, and are not suitable for demanding imaging techniques. An MRI system was developed that combines low field strength (0.55 T) with high-performance imaging technology. Purpose To evaluate applications of a high-performance low-field-strength MRI system, specifically MRI-guided cardiovascular catheterizations with metallic devices, diagnostic imaging in high-susceptibility regions, and efficient image acquisition strategies. Materials and Methods A commercial 1.5-T MRI system was modified to operate at 0.55 T while maintaining high-performance hardware, shielded gradients (45 mT/m; 200 T/m/sec), and advanced imaging methods. MRI was performed between January 2018 and April 2019. T1, T2, and T2* were measured at 0.55 T; relaxivity of exogenous contrast agents was measured; and clinical applications advantageous at low field were evaluated. Results There were 83 0.55-T MRI examinations performed in study participants (45 women; mean age, 34 years ± 13). On average, T1 was 32% shorter, T2 was 26% longer, and T2* was 40% longer at 0.55 T compared with 1.5 T. Nine metallic interventional devices were found to be intrinsically safe at 0.55 T (
ISSN:0033-8419
1527-1315
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2019190452