Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) to Detect Anti-HLA Antibodies: Old but Gold

Background The criterion (gold) standard to detect anti‐human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is the complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay. Recently, more sensitive methods have been used for the same purpose. Methods This study analyzed 70 serum samples of patients with end‐stage renal d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2014-07, Vol.28 (4), p.275-280
Hauptverfasser: Saito, Patrícia Keiko, Yamakawa, Roger Haruki, da Silva Pereira, Lucieni Christina Marques, da Silva Junior, Waldir Veríssimo, Borelli, Sueli Donizete
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The criterion (gold) standard to detect anti‐human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is the complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay. Recently, more sensitive methods have been used for the same purpose. Methods This study analyzed 70 serum samples of patients with end‐stage renal disease using CDC, CDC with the addition of anti‐human globulin (CDC‐AHG), CDC with the addition of dithiothreitol (CDC‐DTT), and the recent solid‐phase immunoassay (SPI; Labscreen PRA) to detect anti‐HLA antibodies. Results Mean percent panel reactive antibodies (PRA) detected by SPI was 37.5% (±34.2) higher than the values detected by the other methods. Comparative analyses revealed significant difference between CDC and CDC‐AHG, and between CDC and SPI (P < 0.0001), but not between CDC‐AHG and SPI (P = 0.8026). Conclusion Although the CDC‐AHG method is “old,” its performance to detect anti‐HLA antibodies in the samples analyzed was comparable to the SPI in the evaluation of percent class I PRA.
ISSN:0887-8013
1098-2825
DOI:10.1002/jcla.21678