Impact of errors of creatinine and cystatin C equations in the selection of living kidney donors

Abstract Background Reliable determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the evaluation of living kidney donors. Although some guidelines recommend the use of measured GFR (mGFR), many centres still rely on estimated GFR (eGFR) obtained through equations or 24-h creatinine cleara...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical kidney journal 2019-10, Vol.12 (5), p.748-755
Hauptverfasser: González-Rinne, Ana, Luis-Lima, Sergio, Escamilla, Beatriz, Negrín-Mena, Natalia, Ramírez, Ana, Morales, Adelaida, Vega, Nicanor, García, Patricia, Cabello, Elisa, Marrero-Miranda, Domingo, Aldea-Perona, Ana, Alvarez, Alejandra, Abad, María del Carmen, Pérez-Tamajón, Lourdes, González-Rinne, Federico, González-Delgado, Alejandra, Díaz Martín, Laura, Jiménez-Sosa, Alejandro, Torres, Armando, Porrini, Esteban
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Reliable determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the evaluation of living kidney donors. Although some guidelines recommend the use of measured GFR (mGFR), many centres still rely on estimated GFR (eGFR) obtained through equations or 24-h creatinine clearance. However, eGFR is neither accurate nor precise in reflecting real renal function. We analysed the impact of eGFR errors on evaluation and decision making regarding potential donors. Methods We evaluated 103 consecutive living donors who underwent mGFR via iohexol plasma clearance and eGFR by 51 creatinine- and/or cystatin C–based equations. The cut-off for living donation in our centre is GFR > 80 mL/min for donors >35 years of age or 90 mL/min for those
ISSN:2048-8505
2048-8513
DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfz012