Clinical Analysis of Propofol, Etomidate and an Admixture of Etomidate and Propofol for Induction of General Anaesthesia

To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE). In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18-60 years of age who were undergoing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2019-10, Vol.47 (5), p.382-386
Hauptverfasser: Rathore, Vikram Singh, Singh, Shalendra, Taank, Priya, Khandelwal, Ankur, Kaushal, Ashutosh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE). In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18-60 years of age who were undergoing elective surgery with general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either propofol 2.5 mg kg IV (group P; n=30), etomidate 0.3 mg kg IV (group E; n=30) or an admixture of etomidate 0.2 mg kg IV and propofol 1 mg kg IV (group PE; n=30) as the induction agent. The haemodynamic response was first recorded at baseline, then at 1 minute following administration the study drug, and 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes following intubation. Perioperative symptoms such as myoclonus, pain upon injection and/or vomiting upon induction as well as postoperative nausea were recorded. We observed a decrease in systemic haemodynamics from baseline following induction in group P compared to groups E and PE (p
ISSN:2667-677X
2149-0937
2667-6370
DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2019.53806