Clinical Analysis of Propofol, Etomidate and an Admixture of Etomidate and Propofol for Induction of General Anaesthesia
To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE). In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18-60 years of age who were undergoing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2019-10, Vol.47 (5), p.382-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE).
In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18-60 years of age who were undergoing elective surgery with general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either propofol 2.5 mg kg
IV (group P; n=30), etomidate 0.3 mg kg
IV (group E; n=30) or an admixture of etomidate 0.2 mg kg
IV and propofol 1 mg kg
IV (group PE; n=30) as the induction agent. The haemodynamic response was first recorded at baseline, then at 1 minute following administration the study drug, and 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes following intubation. Perioperative symptoms such as myoclonus, pain upon injection and/or vomiting upon induction as well as postoperative nausea were recorded.
We observed a decrease in systemic haemodynamics from baseline following induction in group P compared to groups E and PE (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2667-677X 2149-0937 2667-6370 |
DOI: | 10.5152/TJAR.2019.53806 |