Temporal changes in left ventricular strain with the development of rejection in paediatric heart transplant recipients

Myocardial strain measurements are increasingly used to detect complications following heart transplantation. However, the temporal association of these changes with allograft rejection is not well defined. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of strain measurements prior to the diagn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiology in the young 2019-07, Vol.29 (7), p.954-959
Hauptverfasser: Godown, Justin, McEachern, William A, Dodd, Debra A, Stanley, Michael, Havens, Corey, Xu, Meng, Slaughter, James C, Bearl, David W, Soslow, Jonathan H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Myocardial strain measurements are increasingly used to detect complications following heart transplantation. However, the temporal association of these changes with allograft rejection is not well defined. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of strain measurements prior to the diagnosis of rejection in paediatric heart transplant recipients. All paediatric heart transplant recipients (2004-2015) with at least one episode of acute rejection were identified. Longitudinal and circumferential strain measurements were assessed at the time of rejection and retrospectively on all echocardiograms until the most recent negative biopsy. Smoothing technique (LOESS) was used to visualise the changes of each variable over time and estimate the time preceding rejection at which alterations are first detectable. A total of 58 rejection episodes were included from 37 unique patients. In the presence of rejection, there were decrements from baseline in global longitudinal strain (-18.2 versus -14.1), global circumferential strain (-24.1 versus -19.6), longitudinal strain rate (-1 versus -0.8), circumferential strain rate (-1.3 versus -1.1), peak longitudinal early diastolic strain rate (1.3 versus 1), and peak circumferential early diastolic strain rate (1.5 versus 1.3) (p
ISSN:1047-9511
1467-1107
DOI:10.1017/S1047951119001185