Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical and Environmental Mycobacterium chimaera Isolates

is a slow-growing nontuberculous species belonging to the complex (MAC). It has been identified globally as the cause of a large outbreak of cardiovascular infections following open heart surgery, but it can also cause respiratory infections in individuals with underlying structural pulmonary diseas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2019-09, Vol.63 (9)
Hauptverfasser: Mok, Simone, Hannan, Margaret M, Nölke, Lars, Stapleton, Patrick, O'Sullivan, Niamh, Murphy, Philip, McLaughlin, Anne Marie, McNamara, Eleanor, Fitzgibbon, Margaret M, Rogers, Thomas R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:is a slow-growing nontuberculous species belonging to the complex (MAC). It has been identified globally as the cause of a large outbreak of cardiovascular infections following open heart surgery, but it can also cause respiratory infections in individuals with underlying structural pulmonary disease. Invasive infections are associated with poor clinical responses, and the optimal antibiotic treatment regimen for these infections is not known. In this study, the drug susceptibility profiles of clinical and environmental isolates for antimicrobial agents that are commonly considered for treatment of MAC infections were determined. All isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin, with a median MIC of 2 μg/ml, while 98% (85/87 isolates) were susceptible to amikacin. Twenty-five percent of isolates (22/87 isolates) had intermediate susceptibility and 52% (46/87 isolates) were resistant to moxifloxacin. Similarly, 39% of isolates (34/87 isolates) had intermediate susceptibility and 39% (34/87 isolates) were resistant to linezolid. MIC breakpoints derived from the literature were used to determine resistance to rifampin (16/87 isolates [18%]), ethambutol (10/87 isolates [11%]), rifabutin (2/87 isolates [2%]), and streptomycin (1/87 isolates [1%]). In conclusion, our results showed that clarithromycin, amikacin, rifabutin, and streptomycin had the best activity against isolates, while susceptibility rates were lower for rifampin and ethambutol. In contrast, there was a high prevalence of isolates that were not susceptible to moxifloxacin or linezolid. While factors in addition to antibiotic susceptibility may determine the outcomes of treatment of infections, our results should inform the selection of antimicrobials as part of the overall therapeutic strategy.
ISSN:0066-4804
1098-6596
DOI:10.1128/AAC.00755-19