Cross-Reactivity Using Chimeric Trypanosoma cruzi Antigens: Diagnostic Performance in Settings Where Chagas Disease and American Cutaneous or Visceral Leishmaniasis Are Coendemic

Chimeric antigens have been proposed as a diagnostic tool for chronic Chagas disease (CD) in both settings where Chagas disease is endemic and those where it is not endemic. Antibody response varies in accordance to each strain, presenting challenges to the use of antigens lacking demonstrated cross...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2019-08, Vol.57 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Daltro, Ramona Tavares, Leony, Leonardo Maia, Freitas, Natália Erdens Maron, Silva, Ângelo Antônio Oliveira, Santos, Emily Ferreira, Del-Rei, Rodrigo Pimenta, Brito, Maria Edileuza Felinto, Brandão-Filho, Sinval Pinto, Gomes, Yara Miranda, Silva, Marcelo Sousa, Donato, Silvia Tavares, Jeronimo, Selma Maria Bezerra, Monteiro, Gloria Regina de Góis, Carvalho, Lucas Pedreira, Magalhães, Andréa Santos, Zanchin, Nilson Ivo Tonin, Celedon, Paola Alejandra Fiorani, Santos, Fred Luciano Neves
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chimeric antigens have been proposed as a diagnostic tool for chronic Chagas disease (CD) in both settings where Chagas disease is endemic and those where it is not endemic. Antibody response varies in accordance to each strain, presenting challenges to the use of antigens lacking demonstrated cross-reactivity with spp. Our group expressed four chimeric proteins (IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4) and previously assessed their diagnostic performance to determine cross-reactivity with spp. Here, we validated our findings using serum samples from different Brazilian geographic areas reporting endemic Chagas disease, endemic visceral or American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL), or both. Overall, 829 serum samples were evaluated using commercial and IBMP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Due to the absence of a reference assay to diagnosis CD, latent class analysis (LCA) was performed through the use of a statistical model. The incidence of cross-reactivity for ACL-positive samples varied from 0.35% (IBMP-8.3) to 0.70% (IBMP-8.1 and IBMP-8.2). Regarding visceral leishmaniasis (VL)-positive samples, the IBMP-8.2 and IBMP-8.3 antigens cross-reacted with six (3.49%) and with only one sample (0.58%), respectively. No cross-reactivity with either ACL or VL was observed for the IBMP-8.4 antigen. Similarly, no cross-reactions were found when VL-positive samples were assayed with IBMP-8.1. The agreement among the results obtained using IBMP antigens ranged from 97.3% for IBMP-8.2 and 99% for IBMP-8.1 and IBMP-8.3 to 100% for IBMP-8.4, demonstrating almost perfect agreement with LCA. Accordingly, in light of the negligible cross-reactivity with both ACL and VL, we suggest the use of IBMP antigens in regions where and spp. are coendemic.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.00762-19