Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials

IMPORTANCE: Many published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) make claims for subgroup differences. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often subgroup claims reported in the abstracts of RCTs are actually supported by statistical evidence (P

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	JAMA internal medicine 2017-04, Vol.177 (4), p.554-560
Hauptverfasser:	Wallach, Joshua D, Sullivan, Patrick G, Trepanowski, John F, Sainani, Kristin L, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Ioannidis, John P. A
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Data Interpretation, Statistical Diagnosis-Related Groups Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Evidence-Based Medicine - standards Humans Intention to Treat Analysis Publishing - standards Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	IMPORTANCE: Many published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) make claims for subgroup differences. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often subgroup claims reported in the abstracts of RCTs are actually supported by statistical evidence (P
ISSN:	2168-6106 2168-6114 2168-6114
DOI:	10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9125