Impaired endothelial function in patients with rapidly stabilized unstable angina: Assessment by noninvasive brachial artery ultrasonography
Background:Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to symptoms of instability in patients with acute coronary syndromes. High‐resolution external ultrasound assessment of the brachial artery responses allows noninvasive determination of endothelial function. Hypothesis:This study was conducted to ass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 1999-11, Vol.22 (11), p.699-703 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to symptoms of instability in patients with acute coronary syndromes. High‐resolution external ultrasound assessment of the brachial artery responses allows noninvasive determination of endothelial function.
Hypothesis:This study was conducted to assess endothelial function in patients with unstable angina using a noninvasive technique.
Methods:We studied 189 patients who were subdivided into three groups. Group 1:60 apparently healthy subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors or symptoms of coronary artery disease; Group 2: 105 subjects with cardiovascular risk factors—arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking, diabetes, and obesity, but no evidence of coronary artery disease; and Group 3: 24 patients with unstable angina (chest pain at rest within the 24 h preceding study entry). All patients underwent pre‐ and postischemic brachial artery test evaluation with measurements of internal arterial diameters and blood flow.
Results:Results are expressed as percentage change from basal values. Subjects in Groups 1 and 2 showed a diameter increase of 19.1 and 11.9%, respectively, whereas patients in Group 3 showed a diameter change of 1.2% (p < 0.002 and < 0.0001, respectively). Calculated blood flow did not differ significantly in Groups 1 or 2 (74.4 and 56.4%), but was notably lower in Group 3 (18.4%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-9289 1932-8737 |
DOI: | 10.1002/clc.4960221104 |