Lesion detection by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab and [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Purpose The main objective of this preliminary analysis of the IMaging PAtients for Cancer drug selecTion (IMPACT)-renal cell cancer (RCC) study is to evaluate the lesion detection of baseline contrast-enhanced CT, [ 89 Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT in detecting ccRCC lesions i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2019-08, Vol.46 (9), p.1931-1939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The main objective of this preliminary analysis of the IMaging PAtients for Cancer drug selecTion (IMPACT)-renal cell cancer (RCC) study is to evaluate the lesion detection of baseline contrast-enhanced CT, [
89
Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [
18
F]FDG-PET/CT in detecting ccRCC lesions in patients with a good or intermediate prognosis metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) according to the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model.
Methods
Between February 2015 and March 2018, 42 newly diagnosed mccRCC patients with good or intermediate prognosis, eligible for watchful waiting, were included. Patients underwent CT, [
89
Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [
18
F]FDG-PET/CT at baseline. Scans were independently reviewed and lesions of ≥10 mm and lymph nodes of ≥15 mm at CT were analyzed. For lesions with [
89
Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab or [
18
F]FDG-uptake visually exceeding background uptake, maximum standardized uptake values (SUV
max
) were measured.
Results
A total of 449 lesions were detected by ≥1 modality (median per patient: 7; ICR 4.25–12.75) of which 42% were in lung, 22% in lymph nodes and 10% in bone. Combined [
89
Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and CT detected more lesions than CT alone: 91% (95%CI: 87–94) versus 56% (95%CI: 50–62
, p
= 0.001), respectively, and more than CT and [
18
F]FDG-PET/CT combined (84% (95%CI:79–88,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-019-04358-9 |