Communicating with Patients with Disability: Perspectives of Practicing Physicians

Background Patient-centered care for people with disability requires effective communication and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Objective To understand physicians’ perspectives on communication experiences with people with disability. Design Twenty semi-structured individ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2019-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1139-1145
Hauptverfasser: Agaronnik, Nicole, Campbell, Eric G., Ressalam, Julie, Iezzoni, Lisa I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Patient-centered care for people with disability requires effective communication and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Objective To understand physicians’ perspectives on communication experiences with people with disability. Design Twenty semi-structured individual interviews. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim for analysis. Setting Massachusetts, October 2017–January 2018. Participants Twenty physicians ranging from 8 to 51 years in practice in primary care or 4 other specialties. Measurements Commonly expressed themes around communication with people with disability. Results Concerns coalesced around 4 broad categories: communication experiences with people who are deaf or hard of hearing, communication with people who are blind or have vision impairment, communication with people who have intellectual disability, and recommendations for improving communication. Although participants in this study reported various efforts to communicate effectively with patients with hearing or vision loss or intellectual disability, many gaps appear to remain, as well as instances where physicians’ preferences run counter to patients’ wishes and the ADA. Examples include physicians’ preferences for remote, online sign language interpreters despite patients desiring in-person interpreters and suggesting that patients arrange for their own interpreters. Few educational materials are available in braille, and electronic medical records may not allow documents to be printed in large font for persons with low vision. Communicating with patients with intellectual disability raised particular concerns, with participants often preferring to interact with caregivers and minimal efforts to involve patients. Conclusions Effective communication is necessary for ensuring the quality of health care for people with disability, and it is legally required under the ADA. Our results suggest that important gaps may remain in ensuring effective communication, and some practicing physicians could benefit from formal training in effective methods for communicating with patients with disability.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-04911-0