A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia – the TEAM‐ET 2·0 trial

Summary Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2019-05, Vol.185 (4), p.691-700
Hauptverfasser: Gisslinger, Heinz, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Hodisch, Juri, Radinoff, Atanas, Karyagina, Elena, Kyrcz‐Krzemień, Slawomira, Abdulkadyrov, Kudrat, Gerbutavicius, Rolandas, Melikyan, Anait, Burgstaller, Sonja, Hus, Marek, Kłoczko, Janusz, Yablokova, Vera, Tzvetkov, Nikolay, Całbecka, Malgorzata, Shneyder, Tatyana, Warzocha, Krzysztof, Jurgutis, Mindaugas, Kaplanov, Kamil, Jilma, Bernd, Schoergenhofer, Christian, Klade, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled, non‐inferiority trial investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide prolonged release (A‐PR) over a reference product in high‐risk ET patients, either anagrelide‐naïve or ‐experienced. In a 6 to 12‐week titration period the individual dose for the consecutive 4‐week maintenance period was identified. The primary endpoint was the mean platelet count during the maintenance period (3 consecutive measurements, day 0, 14, 28). Of 112 included patients 106 were randomized. The mean screening platelet counts were 822 × 109/l (95% confidence interval (CI) 707–936 × 109/l) and 797 × 109/l (95% CI 708–883 × 109/l) for A‐PR and the reference product, respectively. Both treatments effectively reduced platelet counts, to mean 281 × 109/l for A‐PR (95% CI 254–311) and 305 × 109/l (95% CI 276–337) for the reference product (P 
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.15824