Bacterial community analysis in upflow multilayer anaerobic reactor treating high‐solids organic wastes

A novel anaerobic digestion configuration, the upflow multi‐layer anaerobic reactor (UMAR), was developed to treat high‐solids organic wastes. The UMAR was hypothesized to form multi‐layer along depth due to the upflow plug flow; use of a recirculation system and a rotating distributor and baffles a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology progress 2017-09, Vol.33 (5), p.1226-1234
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Si‐Kyung, Jung, Kyung‐Won, Kim, Dong‐Hoon, Kwon, Joong‐Chun, Ijaz, Umer Zeeshan, Shin, Seung Gu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A novel anaerobic digestion configuration, the upflow multi‐layer anaerobic reactor (UMAR), was developed to treat high‐solids organic wastes. The UMAR was hypothesized to form multi‐layer along depth due to the upflow plug flow; use of a recirculation system and a rotating distributor and baffles aimed to assist treating high‐solids influent. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency and methane (CH4) production rate were 89% and 2.10 L CH4/L/d, respectively, at the peak influent COD concentration (110.4 g/L) and organic loading rate (7.5 g COD/L/d). The 454 pyrosequencing results clearly indicated heterogeneous distribution of bacterial communities at different vertical locations (upper, middle, and bottom) of the UMAR. Firmicutes was the dominant (>70%) phylum at the middle and bottom parts, while Deltaproteobacteria and Chloroflexi were only found in the upper part. Potential functions of the bacteria were discussed to speculate on their roles in the anaerobic performance of the UMAR system. © 2017 The Authors Biotechnology Progress published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 33:1226–1234, 2017
ISSN:8756-7938
1520-6033
DOI:10.1002/btpr.2540