Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

Objective To evaluate the influence of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)‐Schwab sagittal modifiers of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI‐LL) on clinical outcomes for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion. Methods This was a single‐institut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic surgery 2017-08, Vol.9 (3), p.304-310
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Hao‐cong, Zhang, Zi‐fang, Wang, Zhao‐han, Cheng, Jun‐yao, Wu, Yun‐chang, Fan, Yi‐ming, Wang, Tian‐hao, Wang, Zheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate the influence of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)‐Schwab sagittal modifiers of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI‐LL) on clinical outcomes for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion. Methods This was a single‐institute, retrospective study. From 2012 to 2014, 44 patients with ADS who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion treatment were reviewed. Radiological evaluations were investigated by standing whole spine (posteroanterior and lateral views) X‐ray and all radiological measurements, including Cobb’s angle, LL, PI, and the grading of vertebral rotation, were performed by two experienced surgeons who were blind to the operations. The patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative PI‐LL and the classification of the SRS‐Schwab: 0 grade PI‐LL (20°, n = 12). The clinical outcomes were assessed according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), and complications. Other characteristic data of patients were also collected, including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, number of fusion levels, and number of decompressions. Results The mean operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 284.5 ± 30.2 min, 1040.5 ± 1207.6 mL, and 14.5 ± 1.9 day. At the last follow‐up (2.6 ± 0.6 years), the radiological and functional parameters, except the grading of vertebral rotation, were all significantly improved in comparison with preoperative results (P 
ISSN:1757-7853
1757-7861
DOI:10.1111/os.12343