Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework

Gene–disease associations implicated in hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility were evaluated using the ClinGen Clinical Validity framework. Forty-two gene–disease pairs were assessed for strength of evidence supporting an association with hereditary colorectal cancer and/or polyp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2019-07, Vol.21 (7), p.1507-1516
Hauptverfasser: Seifert, Bryce A., McGlaughon, Jennifer L., Jackson, Sarah A., Ritter, Deborah I., Roberts, Maegan E., Schmidt, Ryan J., Thompson, Bryony A., Jimenez, Sharisse, Trapp, Mackenzie, Lee, Kristy, Plon, Sharon E., Offit, Kenneth, Stadler, Zsofia K., Zhang, Liying, Greenblatt, Marc S., Ferber, Matthew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gene–disease associations implicated in hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility were evaluated using the ClinGen Clinical Validity framework. Forty-two gene–disease pairs were assessed for strength of evidence supporting an association with hereditary colorectal cancer and/or polyposis. Genetic and experimental evidence supporting each gene–disease relationship was curated independently by two trained biocurators. Evidence was reviewed with experts and assigned a final clinical validity classification. Of all gene–disease pairs evaluated, 14/42 (33.3%) were Definitive, 1/42 (2.4%) were Strong, 6/42 (14.3%) were Moderate, 18/42 (42.9%) were Limited, and 3/42 (7.1%) were either No Reported Evidence, Disputed, or Refuted. Of panels in the National Institutes of Health Genetic Testing Registry, 4/26 (~15.4%) contain genes with Limited clinical evidence. Clinicians and laboratory diagnosticians should note that 40% have only Moderate, Limited, Disputed, or Refuted evidence. Continuing to expand the structured assessment of the clinical relevance of genes listed on hereditary cancer testing panels will help clinicians and diagnostic laboratories focus the communication of genetic testing results on clinically significant genes.
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
1530-0366
DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0373-1