Attitudes towards genetics and genetic testing among participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies

Genetic analysis has become integral to many large cohort studies. However, little is known about longitudinal cohort study participants’ attitudes towards genetics and genetic testing. We analyzed data from a survey of participants in the Jackson Heart Study (n=960), Framingham Heart Study (n=955),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2019-05, Vol.14 (3), p.262-273
Hauptverfasser: Saylor, Katherine W., Ekunwe, Lynette, Antoine-Lavigne, Donna, Sellers, Deborah E., McGraw, Sarah, Levy, Daniel, Splansky, Greta Lee, Joffe, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Genetic analysis has become integral to many large cohort studies. However, little is known about longitudinal cohort study participants’ attitudes towards genetics and genetic testing. We analyzed data from a survey of participants in the Jackson Heart Study (n=960), Framingham Heart Study (n=955), and Framingham Heart Study-Omni Cohort (n=160). Based on a three-question attitude scale, most participants had positive attitudes towards genetic testing (median score 4.3–5/5). Participants were also asked to select words to describe their attitudes towards genetics. More respondents endorsed the positive words “hopeful” (60–70%), “optimistic” (44–64%), “enthusiastic” (35–43%), or “excited” (28–30%) than the negative words “cautious” (35–38%), “concerned” (25–55%), “worried” (6–13%), “pessimistic” (2–5%) or “horrified” (1–5%). Characteristics associated with favorable attitudes were greater genetics knowledge, higher subjective numeracy, experience with genetic testing, less frequent religious attendance, and not being employed. These findings demonstrate variation in attitudes even among participants in long-standing cohort studies, indicating a need for ongoing participant engagement and education.
ISSN:1556-2646
1556-2654
DOI:10.1177/1556264619844851