Performance Assessment and Selection of Normalization Procedures for Single-Cell RNA-Seq
Systematic measurement biases make normalization an essential step in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. There may be multiple competing considerations behind the assessment of normalization performance, of which some may be study specific. We have developed “scone”— a flexible framewo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cell systems 2019-04, Vol.8 (4), p.315-328.e8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Systematic measurement biases make normalization an essential step in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. There may be multiple competing considerations behind the assessment of normalization performance, of which some may be study specific. We have developed “scone”— a flexible framework for assessing performance based on a comprehensive panel of data-driven metrics. Through graphical summaries and quantitative reports, scone summarizes trade-offs and ranks large numbers of normalization methods by panel performance. The method is implemented in the open-source Bioconductor R software package scone. We show that top-performing normalization methods lead to better agreement with independent validation data for a collection of scRNA-seq datasets. scone can be downloaded at http://bioconductor.org/packages/scone/.
[Display omitted]
•Proper normalization of scRNA-seq datasets is critical for fair interpretation•Different scRNA-seq datasets require different normalization strategies•“scone” assesses and ranks normalization methods according to their performance•High-ranking methods show better agreement with independent validation data
We have developed an approach for exploratory analysis and normalization of scRNA-seq data that enables execution of a wide array of normalization procedures and provides principled assessment of their performance based on a comprehensive set of data-driven performance metrics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-4712 2405-4720 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.010 |