Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of extramural venous invasion in patients with primary rectal cancer

To evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to T weighted imaging (T WI) for detection of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in patients with primary rectal cancer. 79 patients (50 men, 29 females, mean age 67.4 years, range 37-87 years) who had undergone rectal MRI and subsequent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2019-04, Vol.92 (1096), p.20180821-20180821
Hauptverfasser: Ahn, Ju Hee, Kim, Seung Ho, Son, Jung Hee, Jo, Sung Jae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to T weighted imaging (T WI) for detection of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in patients with primary rectal cancer. 79 patients (50 men, 29 females, mean age 67.4 years, range 37-87 years) who had undergone rectal MRI and subsequently received surgical resection were included. The rectal MRI consisted of T WI in three planes and axial DWI (b-values, 0, 1000 s mm ). Two radiologists blinded to the pathologic results independently reviewed the T WI first, and then the combined T WI and DWI 4 weeks later. They recorded their confidence scores for EMVI on a 5-point scale (0: definitely negative and 4: definitely positive). The diagnostic performance of each reading session for each reader was compared by pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was considered as the diagnostic performance. The result of a histopathological examination served as the reference standard for EMVI. For both readers, the diagnostic performance was not significantly different between the two image sets (for reader 1, AUC, 0.828 and 0.825, p = 0.9426 and for reader 2, AUC, 0.723 and 0.726, p = 0.9244, respectively). There was no added value of DWI to T2WI for detection of EMVI in patients with primary rectal cancer. High-resolution T2WI alone is sufficient to assess EMVI and a supplementary DWI has no added value in patients with primary rectal cancer.
ISSN:0007-1285
1748-880X
DOI:10.1259/bjr.20180821