Erenumab in chronic migraine: Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized double-blind study

OBJECTIVETo determine the effect of erenumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), headache impact, and disability in patients with chronic migraine (CM). METHODSIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled study,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2019-05, Vol.92 (19), p.e2250-e2260
Hauptverfasser: Lipton, Richard B, Tepper, Stewart J, Reuter, Uwe, Silberstein, Stephen, Stewart, Walter F, Nilsen, Jon, Leonardi, Dean K, Desai, Pooja, Cheng, Sunfa, Mikol, Daniel D, Lenz, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVETo determine the effect of erenumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), headache impact, and disability in patients with chronic migraine (CM). METHODSIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 667 adults with CM were randomized (3:2:2) to placebo or erenumab (70 or 140 mg monthly). Exploratory endpoints included migraine-specific HRQoL (Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [MSQ]), headache impact (Headache Impact Test–6 [HIT-6]), migraine-related disability (Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] test), and pain interference (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Pain Interference Scale short form 6b). RESULTSImprovements were observed for all endpoints in both erenumab groups at month 3, with greater changes relative to placebo observed at month 1 for many outcomes. All 3 MSQ domains were improved from baseline with treatment differences for both doses exceeding minimally important differences established for MSQ–role function-restrictive (≥3.2) and MSQ–emotional functioning (≥7.5) and for MSQ–role function-preventive (≥4.5) for erenumab 140 mg. Changes from baseline in HIT-6 scores at month 3 were −5.6 for both doses vs −3.1 for placebo. MIDAS scores at month 3 improved by −19.4 days for 70 mg and −19.8 days for 140 mg vs −7.5 days for placebo. Individual-level minimally important difference was achieved by larger proportions of erenumab-treated participants than placebo for all MSQ domains and HIT-6. Lower proportions of erenumab-treated participants had MIDAS scores of severe (≥21) or very severe (≥41) or PROMIS scores ≥60 at month 3. CONCLUSIONSErenumab-treated patients with CM experienced clinically relevant improvements across a broad range of patient-reported outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIERNCT02066415. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, erenumab treatment improves HRQoL, headache impact, and disability.
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007452