Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement

To compare the cost of and payments for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a novel and expensive technology, and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Medicare claims provided hospital charges, payments, and outcomes between January and December 2012. Hospital costs and charges were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2017-12, Vol.154 (6), p.1872-1880.e1
Hauptverfasser: McCarthy, Fenton H., Savino, Danielle C., Brown, Chase R., Bavaria, Joseph E., Kini, Vinay, Spragan, Danielle D., Dibble, Taylor R., Herrmann, Howard C., Anwaruddin, Saif, Giri, Jay, Szeto, Wilson Y., Groeneveld, Peter W., Desai, Nimesh D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the cost of and payments for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a novel and expensive technology, and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Medicare claims provided hospital charges, payments, and outcomes between January and December 2012. Hospital costs and charges were estimated using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Costs and payments were examined in propensity score– matched TAVR and SAVR patients. Medicare spent $215,770,200 nationally on 4083 patients who underwent TAVR in 2012. Hospital costs were higher for TAVR patients (median, $50,200; interquartile range [IQR], $39,800-$64,300) than for propensity-matched SAVR patients ($45,500; IQR, $34,500-$63,300; P 
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.020