A332 ERCP COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT TOOL: DEVELOPMENT OF A PROCEDURE-SPECIFIC ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR ERCP

Abstract Background There is a paucity of literature evaluating competence in advanced endoscopic modalities in the treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases. Traditionally, competency in endoscopy has been measured by procedural volume and adverse events. A formal curriculum has not been widely establ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2018-03, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.577-578
Hauptverfasser: Walsh, C M, Grover, S C, Plener, I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background There is a paucity of literature evaluating competence in advanced endoscopic modalities in the treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases. Traditionally, competency in endoscopy has been measured by procedural volume and adverse events. A formal curriculum has not been widely established to standardize proficiency in ERCP. It is clear, from both training and patient quality perspectives that defined outcomes for clinical competence at the conclusion of advanced endoscopic training needs to be established. Aims We propose to develop a competency tool for ERCP using a standardized Delphi Approach. Methods Delphi Panel Recruitment and Sample: Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus amongst a panel of recruited international therapeutic endoscopy experts (Therapeutic Endoscopists, Surgeons, Endoscopy Nurses) to establish criteria for assessing ERCP competence. Item Generation and Finalization of ERCP Competency Assessment Tool: Systematic Literature review (ERCP Performance and Assessment) followed by open-ended survey of panel members with opportunity for expert panelist commentary and input. Structure surveys distributed according to Dilman’s tailored design method. Results: Initial Round a) Respondents identify the importance of each checklist and global rating item using an ordinal scale. b) Respondents asked to list up to 10-additional checklist or global rating items not included they deeme to be important. Checklist Items (Figure 2) Divided into Pre-Procedure, Intra-Procedure and Post-Procedure domains. Procedure competency is further subdivided into Technical, Cognitive and Global Rating domains. Analysis of Responses Descriptive statistics to establish mean rating with a 95% confidence interval within each category of ordinal scoring. Checklist or global item to be removed if mean rating < 4.0 and critical rating
ISSN:2515-2084
2515-2092
DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.333