Predictors of positive electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block: PR interval and type of conduction disturbance
Background Electrophysiological study (EPS) is indicated in patients with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB). Data about predictors of positive EPS in these patients is scarce. Objective To assess clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of positive EPS in patients with syncope and BBB....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 2018-12, Vol.41 (12), p.1537-1542 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Electrophysiological study (EPS) is indicated in patients with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB). Data about predictors of positive EPS in these patients is scarce.
Objective
To assess clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of positive EPS in patients with syncope and BBB.
Methods
Observational single‐center study that included all consecutive patients with syncope and BBB that underwent EPS from January 2011 to June 2017. Results of EPS were considered positive according to current ESC syncope guidelines.
Results
During study period, 271 patients were included (64.9% male, age: 73.9 ± 12.2 years, number of syncopal episodes: 2.4 ± 2.5, LVEF: 56.1 ± 9.9%). Type of BBB: RBBB + LAFB/LPFB in 39.8%, isolated LBBB in 38.7% and isolated RBBB in 18.5% of the patients. Duration of QRS and PR interval were 141.9 ± 16.7 and 182.8 ± 52.2 milliseconds. EPS was positive in 41.7% of the patients. In multivariate analysis, conduction disturbance pattern and long PR interval (OR 8.6; 2.9‐25; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-9289 1932-8737 |
DOI: | 10.1002/clc.23079 |