Improved Treatment Outcomes With Bedaquiline When Substituted for Second-line Injectable Agents in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Bedaquiline is used as a substitute for second-line injectable (SLI) intolerance in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, but the efficacy and safety of this strategy is unknown. Methods In this retrospective cohort study adults receiving bedaquiline substituti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2019-04, Vol.68 (9), p.1522-1529
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Ying, Fox, Tamaryn, Manning, Kathryn, Stewart, Annemie, Tiffin, Nicki, Khomo, Ntokozo, Leslie, Joshua, Boulle, Andrew, Mudaly, Vanessa, Kock, Yulene, Meintjes, Graeme, Wasserman, Sean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Bedaquiline is used as a substitute for second-line injectable (SLI) intolerance in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, but the efficacy and safety of this strategy is unknown. Methods In this retrospective cohort study adults receiving bedaquiline substitution for MDR tuberculosis therapy, plus a matched control group who did not receive bedaquiline, were identified from the electronic tuberculosis register in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with death, loss to follow-up, or failure to achieve sustained culture conversion at 12 months of treatment. Results Data from 162 patients who received bedaquiline substitution and 168 controls were analyzed; 70.6% were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 35 of 146 (23.9%) patients in the bedaquiline group versus 51 of 141 (36.2%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, .46 –.95). The number of patients with culture reversion was lower in those receiving bedaquiline (1 patient; 0.8%) than in controls (12 patients; 10.3%; P = .001). Delayed initiation of bedaquiline was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained culture conversion (adjusted odds ratio for every 30-day delay, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–1.9). Mortality rates were similar at 12 months (11 deaths in each group; P = .97). Conclusions Substituting bedaquiline for SLIs in MDR tuberculosis treatment resulted in improved outcomes at 12 months compared with patients who continued taking SLIs, supporting the use of bedaquiline for MDR tuberculosis treatment in programmatic settings. In this population with a high human immunodeficiency virus coinfection rate, bedaquiline substitution for second-line injectable agents was associated with fewer unfavorable treatment outcomes at 12 months than in a matched control group receiving standard multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciy727