Reliability and validity of the instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for epidermolysis bullosa (iscorEB)

Summary Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare and currently incurable genetic blistering disorders. As more pathogenic‐driven therapies are being developed, there is an important need for EB‐specific validated outcomes measures designed for use in clinical trials. Objectives To te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2018-05, Vol.178 (5), p.1128-1134
Hauptverfasser: Bruckner, A.L., Fairclough, D.L., Feinstein, J.A., Lara‐Corrales, I., Lucky, A.W., Tolar, J., Pope, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare and currently incurable genetic blistering disorders. As more pathogenic‐driven therapies are being developed, there is an important need for EB‐specific validated outcomes measures designed for use in clinical trials. Objectives To test the reliability and construct validity of an instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for EB (iscorEB), a new combined clinician‐ and patient‐reported outcomes tool. Methods We conducted an observational study consisting of independent 1‐day assessments (six assessors) at two academic hospitals. The assessments consisted of iscorEB clinician (iscorEB‐c), Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity (BEBS) and global severity assessment for physicians; and iscorEB patient (iscorEB‐p), Quality of Life evaluation in Epidermolysis Bullosa and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index for patients. Construct validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver, intraobserver and test–retest reliability were calculated. Results Overall, 31 patients with a mean age of 19·5 years (1·8–45·2) were included. Disease severity was mild in 42% of cases, moderate in 29% and severe in 29%. The interobserver ICC was 0·96 for both the clinician‐reported section of iscorEB‐c and BEBS. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0·91 and 0·70 for the skin and mucosal domains of iscorEB‐c, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for iscorEB‐c was 0·89. The test–retest reliability of iscorEB‐p was 0·97 and Cronbach's alpha was 0·84. The clinical score differentiated between subjects with mild, moderate and severe disease, and both clinical and patient subscores discriminated between recessive dystrophic EB and other EB subtypes. Conclusions iscorEB has robust reliability and construct validity, including strong ability to distinguish EB types and severities. Further studies are planned to test its responsiveness to change. What's already known about this topic? Outcome measures that test epidermolysis bullosa (EB) severity are limited. There is a need for valid tools that assess EB severity in the context of clinical trials. What does this study add ? The instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for EB (iscorEB) is a new combined clinician‐ and patient‐reported outcomes tool. The iscorEB has robust reliability and construct validity, including a strong ability to distinguish EB types and severities. Plain language summary available online Respond to
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.16350