Predatory lizards perceive plant‐derived volatile odorants

Many lizards are olfactory foragers and prey upon herbivorous arthropods, yet their responses to common herbivore‐associated plant volatiles remain unknown. As such, their role in mediating plant indirect defenses also remains largely obscured. In this paper, we use a cotton‐swab odor presentation a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2019-04, Vol.9 (8), p.4733-4738
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, Jay K., Pintel, Genevieve, Weiss, Stacey L., Martins, Emília P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many lizards are olfactory foragers and prey upon herbivorous arthropods, yet their responses to common herbivore‐associated plant volatiles remain unknown. As such, their role in mediating plant indirect defenses also remains largely obscured. In this paper, we use a cotton‐swab odor presentation assay to ask whether lizards respond to two arthropod‐associated plant‐derived volatile compounds: 2‐(E)‐hexenal and hexanoic acid. We studied the response of two lizard species, Sceloporus virgatusand Aspidoscelis exsanguis, because they differ substantially in their foraging behavior. We found that the actively foraging A. exsanguisresponded strongly to hexanoic acid, whereas the ambush foraging S. virgatus responded to 2‐(E)‐hexenal—an herbivore‐associated plant volatile involved in indirect defense against herbivores. These findings indicate that S. virgatus may contribute to plant indirect defense and that a species' response to specific odorants is linked with foraging mode. Future studies can elucidate how lizards use various compounds to locate prey and how these responses impact plant‐herbivore interactions. Despite a wealth of literature suggesting that lizards are highly olfactory foragers and benefit plants by consuming herbivorous insects, it remains unknown if they respond to the chemical “cry for help” that plants use to attract the natural enemies of herbivores. In this study, we examine the responses of two lizard species to two selected volatiles known to be involved with plant indirect defenses. We found that an ambush foraging species responded to a plant volatile, while an actively foraging species responded to a component of herbivore body/frass odor.
ISSN:2045-7758
2045-7758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.5076