The evolution of collective infectious units in viruses
•Many viruses disperse in groups, as part of collective infectious units (CIUs).•We modelled different factors that could influence the evolution of CIUs.•Group infectivity benefits favoured CIUs, especially if CIUs were more efficient.•Defective genomes did not favour or disfavour CIUs.•Defective i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Virus research 2019-05, Vol.265, p.94-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Many viruses disperse in groups, as part of collective infectious units (CIUs).•We modelled different factors that could influence the evolution of CIUs.•Group infectivity benefits favoured CIUs, especially if CIUs were more efficient.•Defective genomes did not favour or disfavour CIUs.•Defective interfering genomes disfavoured CIUs.
Viruses frequently spread among cells or hosts in groups, with multiple viral genomes inside the same infectious unit. These collective infectious units can consist of multiple viral genomes inside the same virion, or multiple virions inside a larger structure such as a vesicle. Collective infectious units deliver multiple viral genomes to the same cell simultaneously, which can have important implications for viral pathogenesis, antiviral resistance, and social evolution. However, little is known about why some viruses transmit in collective infectious units, whereas others do not. We used a simple evolutionary approach to model the potential costs and benefits of transmitting in a collective infectious unit. We found that collective infectious units could be favoured if cells infected by multiple viral genomes were significantly more productive than cells infected by just one viral genome, and especially if there were also efficiency benefits to packaging multiple viral genomes inside the same infectious unit. We also found that if some viral sequences are defective, then collective infectious units could evolve to become very large, but that if these defective sequences interfered with wild-type virus replication, then collective infectious units were disfavoured. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-1702 1872-7492 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.03.013 |