S45. DEFICITS IN INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOR IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: AN ALTERNATIVE MECHANISM OF AVOLITION

Abstract Background A wealth of data points to a role for deficient reward-seeking behavior in schizophrenia (SZ), as a mechanism of negative symptoms, in general, and avolition, in particular. Specifically, avolitional patients with SZ appear to experience reinforcers in a normative manner, but do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia bulletin 2019-04, Vol.45 (Supplement_2), p.S323-S323
Hauptverfasser: Waltz, James, Hernaus, Dennis, Nassar, Matthew, Ritz, Harrison, Xu, Ziye, Frank, Michael, Ruiz, Rebecca, Gold, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background A wealth of data points to a role for deficient reward-seeking behavior in schizophrenia (SZ), as a mechanism of negative symptoms, in general, and avolition, in particular. Specifically, avolitional patients with SZ appear to experience reinforcers in a normative manner, but do not properly assign prospective value to rewards or actions that frequently lead to rewards. There are many forms of goal-directed behavior, however, with reward-seeking behavior being only one. A second kind of goal-directed behavior is exploration: seeking out information about contingencies in the environment, so as to reduce uncertainty about available options. Successful navigation of the explore/exploit trade-off is critical to adaptive behavior. In several different studies, we have examined information-seeking behavior in individuals with SZ and matched controls, hypothesizing that reductions in goal-directed exploration make substantial contribution to avolition. Methods We have used several different behavioral paradigms incorporating an explore/exploit trade-off in samples of SZ patients and matched controls. Two of these paradigms were forms of reversal learning tasks, where individuals learn to choose the most-frequently-rewarded of two or three stimuli, with reward contingencies changing after a certain number of consecutive correct choices. A third paradigm required participants to track the value of three slot machines across stable and volatile runs of trials (when reward contingencies changed suddenly, independent of performance). All of these paradigms were performed in conjunction with fMRI scanning, with single-subject MRI data being analyzed using parametric (amplitude-modulated) regressors constructed based on trial-wise estimates of expected value, certainty about value, and the degree to which choices were reward-seeking (choosing the slot machines with the highest EV) vs. information-seeking (driven by the exploration of unknown contingencies), from computational analyses. Results In the context of reversal learning tasks, we have found that SZ patients show: 1) aberrant MRI signals in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and frontopolar cortex (FPC) in conjunction with response-set-shifting behavior; 2) a reduced ability to adjust learning rates in accordance with the volatility of the learning environment; and 3) that this behavioral deficit is accompanied by reduced connectivity between dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and ven
ISSN:0586-7614
1745-1701
DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbz020.590