Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor

Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies have the potential to significantly disrupt labor markets.While AI and automation can augment the productivity of some workers, they can replace the work done by others and will likely transform almost all occupations at leas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2019-04, Vol.116 (14), p.6531-6539
Hauptverfasser: Frank, Morgan R., Autor, David, Bessen, James E., Brynjolfsson, Erik, Cebrian, Manuel, Deming, David J., Feldman, Maryann, Groh, Matthew, Lobo, José, Moro, Esteban, Wang, Dashun, Youn, Hyejin, Rahwan, Iyad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies have the potential to significantly disrupt labor markets.While AI and automation can augment the productivity of some workers, they can replace the work done by others and will likely transform almost all occupations at least to some degree. Rising automation is happening in a period of growing economic inequality, raising fears of mass technological unemployment and a renewed call for policy efforts to address the consequences of technological change. In this paper we discuss the barriers that inhibit scientists frommeasuring the effects of AI and automation on the future of work. These barriers include the lack of high-quality data about the nature of work (e.g., the dynamic requirements of occupations), lack of empirically informed models of key microlevel processes (e.g., skill substitution and human–machine complementarity), and insufficient understanding of how cognitive technologies interact with broader economic dynamics and institutional mechanisms (e.g., urban migration and international trade policy). Overcoming these barriers requires improvements in the longitudinal and spatial resolution of data, as well as refinements to data on workplace skills. These improvements will enable multidisciplinary research to quantitatively monitor and predict the complex evolution of work in tandem with technological progress. Finally, given the fundamental uncertainty in predicting technological change, we recommend developing a decision framework that focuses on resilience to unexpected scenarios in addition to general equilibrium behavior.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1900949116