Assessing the predictive accuracy of oral glucose effectiveness index using a calibration model

Purpose Current reference methods for measuring glucose effectiveness (GE) are the somatostatin pancreatic glucose clamp and minimal model analysis of frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT), both of which are laborious and not feasible in large epidemiological studies. Conse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine 2019-02, Vol.63 (2), p.391-397
Hauptverfasser: Glicksman, Michael, Grewal, Shivraj, Sortur, Shrayus, Abel, Brent S., Auh, Sungyoung, Gaillard, Trudy R., Osei, Kwame, Muniyappa, Ranganath
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Current reference methods for measuring glucose effectiveness (GE) are the somatostatin pancreatic glucose clamp and minimal model analysis of frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT), both of which are laborious and not feasible in large epidemiological studies. Consequently, surrogate indices derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to measure GE (oGE) have been proposed and used in many studies. However, the predictive accuracy of these surrogates has not been formally validated. In this study, we used a calibration model analysis to evaluate the accuracy of surrogate indices to predict GE from the reference FSIVGTT (Sg MM ). Methods Subjects ( n  = 123, mean age 48 ± 11 years; BMI 35.9 ± 7.3 kg/m 2 ) with varying glucose tolerance (NGT, n  = 37; IFG/IGT, n  = 78; and T2DM, n  = 8) underwent FSIVGTT and OGTT on two separate days. Predictive accuracy was assessed by both root mean squared error (RMSE) of prediction and leave-one-out cross-validation-type RMSE of prediction (CVPE). Results As expected, insulin sensitivity, Sg MM , and oGE were reduced in subjects with T2DM and IFG/IGT when compared with NGT. Simple linear regression analyses revealed a modest but significant relationship between oGE and Sg MM ( r  = 0.25, p  
ISSN:1355-008X
1559-0100
DOI:10.1007/s12020-018-1804-0