The effect of economy type on reinforcer value
•This article reviews research on the effect of economy type on reinforcer value.•Reinforcer value is often lower in the open economy than in the closed economy.•However, differences in satiation may account for the results of some studies.•Potential explanations of the economy type effect are discu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioural processes 2019-05, Vol.162, p.20-28 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •This article reviews research on the effect of economy type on reinforcer value.•Reinforcer value is often lower in the open economy than in the closed economy.•However, differences in satiation may account for the results of some studies.•Potential explanations of the economy type effect are discussed.
This article reviews studies investigating the effect of economy type on reinforcer value. In a closed economy, consumption of the reinforcer depends entirely on the subject’s behavior, whereas in an open economy it does not, due, for example, to the provision of free reinforcers after the session. In theory, reinforcers should have higher value in a closed economy than in an open economy. Experimental results relevant to this prediction and methods used to test economy type effects are summarized and discussed here. Studies have tested the effect of economy type on the value of a variety of reinforcers, including food, water, saccharin, various drugs, and video games. Subjects used have varied also and include humans, monkeys, rats, and mice. Whether economy type had an effect on reinforcer value appears to depend on the particular reinforcer studied and on the species used. In general, where there was a difference in reinforcer value across economies, the effect was consistent with the prediction that value should be lower in the open economy. In some studies, however, satiation across economy types may have been responsible for the difference, or at least contributed to it. Potential explanations for the economy type effect, including substitution of future reinforcers for current reinforcers, contingency degradation, anticipatory contrast, and optimal foraging, are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.01.008 |