Specific allelic variants of SNPs in the MDM2 and MDMX genes are associated with earlier tumor onset and progression in Caucasian breast cancer patients

Genetic factors play a substantial role in breast cancer etiology. Genes encoding proteins that have key functions in the DNA damage response, such as p53 and its inhibitors MDM2 and MDMX, are most likely candidates to harbor allelic variants that influence breast cancer susceptibility. The aim of o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncotarget 2019-03, Vol.10 (20), p.1975-1992
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, Marcus, Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna, Stiewe, Thorsten, Nist, Andrea, Mernberger, Marco, Politt, Katharina, Hanf, Volker, Lantzsch, Tilmann, Uleer, Christoph, Peschel, Susanne, John, Jutta, Buchmann, Jörg, Weigert, Edith, Bürrig, Karl-Friedrich, Wickenhauser, Claudia, Thomssen, Christoph, Bartel, Frank, Vetter, Martina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Genetic factors play a substantial role in breast cancer etiology. Genes encoding proteins that have key functions in the DNA damage response, such as p53 and its inhibitors MDM2 and MDMX, are most likely candidates to harbor allelic variants that influence breast cancer susceptibility. The aim of our study was to comprehensively analyze the impact of SNPs in the , , and genes in conjunction with mutational status regarding the onset and progression of breast cancer. In specimen from 815 breast cancer patients, five SNPs within the selected genes were analyzed: - Arg72Pro (rs1042522), - SNP285 (rs2279744), SNP309 (rs117039649); - SNP31826 (rs1563828), and SNP34091 (rs4245739). Classification of the tumors was evaluated by histomorphology. Subtyping according hormone receptor status, HER2-status and proliferation rate enabled provision of the clinico-pathological surrogate of intrinsic subtypes. The homozygous C-allele of SNP285 was significantly associated with a younger age-at-diagnosis of 44.2 years, in contrast to G/G- and G/C-patients (62.4, 62.7 yrs., respectively; = 0.0007; log-Rank-test). In contrast, there was no difference regarding the age-at-diagnosis for patients with the respective genotypes of SNP309 ( = 0.799; log-Rank-test). In patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and -mutated tumors, however, the T/T-genotype of the SNP309 was significantly associated with an earlier average age-at-diagnosis compared with T/G+G/G-patients (53.5 vs. 68.2 yrs; = 0.002; log-Rank-test). In the triple-negative subgroup, the G/G-patients had an average age-at-diagnosis of 51 years compared with 63 years for SNP309T carriers ( = 0.004; log-Rank-test) indicating a susceptibility of the G/G genotype for the development of triple negative breast cancer. Patients with the A/A-genotype of SNP31826 with ER-negative tumors were diagnosed 11 years earlier compared with patients and ER-positive tumors (53.2 vs. 64.4 yrs; = 0.025, log-Rank-test). Furthermore, in luminal B-like patients (HER2-independent) the C/C-genotype of SNP34091 was significantly correlated with a decreased event-free survival compared with the A/A-genotype ( < 0.001; log-Rank-test). We showed that SNPs in the and genes affect at least in part the onset and progression of breast cancer dependent on the ER-status. Our findings provide further evidence for the distinct etiological pathways in ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancers.
ISSN:1949-2553
1949-2553
DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.26768