Vascularized Periosteal Flaps Accelerate Osteointegration and Revascularization of Allografts in Rats

Surgical reconstruction of large bone defects with structural bone allografts can restore bone stock but is associated with complications such as nonunion, fracture, and infection. Vascularized reconstructive techniques may provide an alternative in the repair of critical bone defects; however, no studies specifically addressing the role of vascularized periosteal flaps in stimulating bone allograft revascularization and osseointegration have been reported. (1) Does a vascularized periosteal flap increase the likelihood of union at the allograft-host junction in a critical-size defect femoral model in rats? (2) Does a vascularized periosteal flap promote revascularization of a critical-size defect structural bone allograft in a rat model? (3) What type of ossification occurs in connection with a vascularized periosteal flap? Sixty-four rats were assigned to two equal groups. In both the control and experimental groups, a 5-cm critical size femoral defect was created in the left femur and then reconstructed with a cryopreserved structural bone allograft and intramedullary nail. In the experimental group, a vascularized periosteal flap from the medial femoral condyle, with a pedicle based on the descending genicular vessels, was associated with the allograft. The 32 rats of each group were divided into subgroups of 4-week (eight rats), 6-week (eight rats), and 10-week (16 rats) followup. At the end of their assigned followup periods, the animals were euthanized and their femurs were harvested for semiquantitative and quantitative analysis using micro-CT (all followup groups), quantitative biomechanical evaluation (eight rats from each 10-week followup group), qualitative confocal microscopic, backscattered electron microscopic, and histology analysis (4-week and 6-week groups and eight rats from each 10-week followup group). When making their analyses, all the examiners were blinded to the treatment groups from which the samples came. There was an improvement in allograft-host bone union in the 10-week experimental group (odds ratio [OR], 19.29 [3.63-184.50], p < 0.05). In contrast to control specimens, greater bone neoformation in the allograft segment was observed in the experimental group (OR [4-week] 63.3 [39.6-87.0], p < 0.05; OR [6-week] 43.4 [20.5-66.3], p < 0.05; OR [10-week] 62.9 [40.1-85.7], p < 0.05). In our biomechanical testing, control samples were not evaluable as a result of premature breakage during the embedding and assembly processes. Ther