The Influence of Patient Race and Activation on Pain Management in Advanced Lung Cancer: a Randomized Field Experiment

Background Pain management racial disparities exist, yet it is unclear whether disparities exist in pain management in advanced cancer. Objective To examine the effect of race on physicians’ pain assessment and treatment in advanced lung cancer and the moderating effect of patient activation. Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2019-03, Vol.34 (3), p.435-442
Hauptverfasser: Shields, Cleveland G., Griggs, Jennifer J., Fiscella, Kevin, Elias, Cezanne M., Christ, Sharon L., Colbert, Joseph, Henry, Stephen G., Hoh, Beth G., Hunte, Haslyn E. R., Marshall, Mary, Mohile, Supriya Gupta, Plumb, Sandy, Tejani, Mohamedtaki A., Venuti, Alison, Epstein, Ronald M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Pain management racial disparities exist, yet it is unclear whether disparities exist in pain management in advanced cancer. Objective To examine the effect of race on physicians’ pain assessment and treatment in advanced lung cancer and the moderating effect of patient activation. Design Randomized field experiment. Physicians consented to see two unannounced standardized patients (SPs) over 18 months. SPs portrayed 4 identical roles—a 62-year-old man with advanced lung cancer and uncontrolled pain—differing by race (black or white) and role (activated or typical). Activated SPs asked questions, interrupted when necessary, made requests, and expressed opinions. Participants Ninety-six primary care physicians (PCPs) and oncologists from small cities, and suburban and rural areas of New York, Indiana, and Michigan. Physicians’ mean age was 52 years (SD = 27.17), 59% male, and 64% white. Main Measures Opioids prescribed (or not), total daily opioid doses (in oral morphine equivalents), guideline-concordant pain management, and pain assessment. Key Results SPs completed 181 covertly audio-recorded visits that had complete data for the model covariates. Physicians detected SPs in 15% of visits. Physicians prescribed opioids in 71% of visits; 38% received guideline-concordant doses. Neither race nor activation was associated with total opioid dose or guideline-concordant pain management, and there were no interaction effects ( p  > 0.05). Activation, but not race, was associated with improved pain assessment ( ẞ , 0.46, 95% CI 0.18, 0.74). In post hoc analyses, oncologists (but not PCPs) were less likely to prescribe opioids to black SPs (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07, 0.81). Conclusions Neither race nor activation was associated with opioid prescribing; activation was associated with better pain assessment. In post hoc analyses, oncologists were less likely to prescribe opioids to black male SPs than white male SPs; PCPs had no racial disparities. In general, physicians may be under-prescribing opioids for cancer pain. Trial Registration NCT01501006
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4785-z