Iatrogenic Vessel Dissection in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Purpose Knowledge about the localization and outcome of iatrogenic dissection (ID) during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. We aimed to determine the frequency, clinical aspects and morphology of ID in endovascular AIS treatment and to identify predictors of this comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neuroradiology (Munich) 2019-03, Vol.29 (1), p.143-151
Hauptverfasser: Goeggel Simonetti, Barbara, Hulliger, Justine, Mathier, Etienne, Jung, Simon, Fischer, Urs, Sarikaya, Hakan, Slotboom, Johannes, Schroth, Gerhard, Mordasini, Pasquale, Gralla, Jan, Arnold, Marcel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Knowledge about the localization and outcome of iatrogenic dissection (ID) during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. We aimed to determine the frequency, clinical aspects and morphology of ID in endovascular AIS treatment and to identify predictors of this complication. Methods Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of ID carried out during endovascular treatment between January 2000 and March 2012 have been re-evaluated. The ID localization and morphology were analyzed and related to the interventional techniques. Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment modality and outcome were compared with patients without ID. Results Out of 866 patients 18 (2%) suffered an ID (44% female, median age 64 years). Localization was extracranial in 15 (83%, 14 internal carotid artery and 1 vertebral artery) and intracranial in 3 (17%; 1 vertebrobasilar dissection and 2 in the anterior circulation). Of the IDs 5 (28%) resulted in a high-degree, 3 (17%) in a moderate, 5 (28%) in a mild and 5 (28%) in no stenosis and 8 IDs were stented in the acute phase. At 3 months 7 (42%) patients had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin score mRS ≤ 2) and 6 (33%) patients had died. Patients with ID had a different stroke etiology ( p  = 0.041), were more likely to be smokers (44% versus 19%, p  = 0.015) and were more likely to be treated with mechanical thrombectomy (100% versus 60%, p  < 0.001). Although two ID patients had relevant complications, the outcome did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The occurrence of ID is a rare complication of endovascular AIS treatment associated with smoking and mechanical thrombectomy.
ISSN:1869-1439
1869-1447
DOI:10.1007/s00062-017-0639-z