Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening

Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical information and modeling 2019-01, Vol.59 (1), p.282-293
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Shengchao, Alnammi, Moayad, Ericksen, Spencer S, Voter, Andrew F, Ananiev, Gene E, Keck, James L, Hoffmann, F. Michael, Wildman, Scott A, Gitter, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approaches for virtual screening on two protein–protein interactions, PriA-SSB and RMI-FANCM, and present a strategy for choosing which algorithm is best for prospective compound prioritization. Our workflow identifies a random forest as the best algorithm for these targets over more sophisticated neural network-based models. The top 250 predictions from our selected random forest recover 37 of the 54 active compounds from a library of 22,434 new molecules assayed on PriA-SSB. We show that virtual screening methods that perform well on public data sets and synthetic benchmarks, like multi-task neural networks, may not always translate to prospective screening performance on a specific assay of interest.
ISSN:1549-9596
1549-960X
DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00363