Single‐Agent Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Any RAS or BRAF Mutation Previously Treated with FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab (PREVIUM Trial)
Lessons Learned RAS‐ or BRAF‐mutated metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) progressing after first‐line treatment have a poor prognosis. European and U.S. guidelines include the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib as a standard option for second‐line therapy and beyond, based on the results of the ran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2018-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1271-e128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lessons Learned
RAS‐ or BRAF‐mutated metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) progressing after first‐line treatment have a poor prognosis.
European and U.S. guidelines include the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib as a standard option for second‐line therapy and beyond, based on the results of the randomized phase III CORRECT trial demonstrating improvement in survival.
Although stopped prematurely for failing to accrue, the PREVIUM trial, the first prospective interventional study exploring regorafenib as second‐line treatment for patients with mCRC bearing RAS or BRAF mutations, failed to demonstrate clinical activity in the population analyzed.
Background
Patients with RAS‐ or BRAF‐mutated (mut) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progressing on first‐line bevacizumab plus 5‐FU/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) have a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in this population.
Methods
Regorafenib was administered daily for 3 weeks of each 4‐week cycle until disease progression or other reason. The primary endpoint was 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS).
Results
KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF was mutated in mCRC samples in 60%, 20%, and 13% of patients, respectively. Median time from initial diagnosis of metastases to the start of regorafenib and treatment duration was 13.8 months and 7 weeks, respectively. Reasons for discontinuation included disease progression (80%), investigator decision (13%), and adverse events (AEs; 7%). Seven patients (47%) required dose reduction, mostly for asthenia (43%). The most common regorafenib‐related grade 3 AEs were asthenia (33%), dysphonia (13%), and hypertension (13%) (Table 1). There were no grade 4 toxicities. No patient was progression‐free at 6 months. Median PFS, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were 2.2, 2.0, and 3.3 months, respectively.
Conclusion
Although stopped prematurely for failing to accrue, in the population analyzed, regorafenib failed to demonstrate clinical activity in KRAS‐ or BRAF‐mutated mCRC with progression following first‐line with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, although tolerability was acceptable. Our trial suggests that exploring regorafenib efficacy in an earlier line of therapy should not be undertaken without better population refinement.
经验获取
• 一线治疗后进展的 RAS 或 BRAF 基因突变转移性结直肠癌 (mCRC) 预后不良。
• 欧洲和美国的指南将多激酶抑制剂瑞格非尼作为二线治疗及后线治疗的标准选择,是根据随机III期CORRECT试验证实生存期改善的结果。
• 虽然因招募失败而提早结束,但PREVIUM 试验是首个前瞻性干预研究探索瑞格非尼作为二线治疗 RAS 或 BRAF 基因突变的 mCRC 患者,未能对分析人群取得临床活性 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1083-7159 1549-490X |
DOI: | 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0316 |