PSXI-39 Effect of legume inclusion and nitrogen fertilization on ammonia volatilization from cattle excreta in tropical grassland

Abstract Ammonia (NH3) is a large source of environmental contamination from nitrogen usage. The objective of this study was to evaluate NH3 losses from urine and dung of cattle grazed in Marandu-grass pastures (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) with different sources of nitrogen. The experiment con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-12, Vol.96 (suppl_3), p.225-226
Hauptverfasser: Longhini, V, Cardoso, A, Berça, A, Boddey, R, van Cleef, F, Reis, R, Ruggieri, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Ammonia (NH3) is a large source of environmental contamination from nitrogen usage. The objective of this study was to evaluate NH3 losses from urine and dung of cattle grazed in Marandu-grass pastures (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) with different sources of nitrogen. The experiment consisted of two factors (pasture management and excreta type) in a randomized complete block design, with 5 replicates. The pastures were: 1) CONTROL: Marandu-grass pastures without nitrogen or legume; 2) FERT: Marandu-grass pastures fertilized with nitrogen (150 kg N ha-1 year-1); 3) MIXED: Marandu-grass pastures intercropped with Pinto peanut (Arachis pintoi cv. Amarillo). The excreta types were dung (1.6 kg/ treatment) and urine (1.0 L/ treatment) from heifers (353.1 ± 24.1 kg BW) grazing in the pastures. Ammonia volatilization was evaluated using semi-opened free static chamber and nitrogen determination by steam distillation. Sampling were performed on 1, 3, 5, 9, 14 and 21 d after treatments being applied to the area. ANOVA was performed for total ammonia volatilized; when differences were observed among means, they were compared using the LSD test. For dung, NH3 losses differed among pasture treatments (P = 0.046). Volatilization losses was greater for FERT pastures (1.04% of applied N) compared with CONTROL (0.83% of applied N) and MIXED (0.81% of applied N) pastures. No differences were observed for urine among treatments for FERT (3.69 of applied N), MIXED (3.63 of applied N) and CONTROL (2.78 of applied N). The NH3 emission factor differed between excreta type (P < 0.0001). Urine averaged 3.40% and dung 0.89% of volatilized N-applied. Urine was the main source of ammonia volatilization, and all estimates of volatilization losses were among the lowest reported in the literature.
ISSN:0021-8812
1525-3163
DOI:10.1093/jas/sky404.491