Effect of multiple‐dose osimertinib on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and rosuvastatin

Aim We report on two Phase 1, open‐label, single‐arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate [BCRP] substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐smal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 2018-12, Vol.84 (12), p.2877-2888
Hauptverfasser: Harvey, R. Donald, Aransay, Noemi Reguart, Isambert, Nicolas, Lee, Jong‐Seok, Arkenau, Tobias, Vansteenkiste, Johan, Dickinson, Paul A., Bui, Khanh, Weilert, Doris, So, Karen, Thomas, Karen, Vishwanathan, Karthick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim We report on two Phase 1, open‐label, single‐arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate [BCRP] substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who have progressed after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to determine, upon coadministration, whether osimertinib could affect the exposure of these agents. Methods Fifty‐two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic [PK] analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44). In the CYP3A study, patients received single doses of simvastatin 40 mg on Days 1 and 31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 3–32. In the BCRP study, single doses of rosuvastatin 20 mg were given on Days 1 and 32, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 4–34. Results Geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) of simvastatin plus osimertinib for area under the plasma concentration–time curves from zero to infinity (AUC) were 91% (77–108): entirely contained within the predefined no relevant effect limits, and Cmax of 77% (63, 94) which was not contained within the limits. GLSM ratios of rosuvastatin plus osimertinib for AUC were 135% (115–157) and Cmax were 172 (146, 203): outside the no relevant effect limits. Conclusions Osimertinib is unlikely to have any clinically relevant interaction with CYP3A substrates and has a weak inhibitory effect on BCRP. No new safety concerns were identified in either study.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.13753