Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution

To assess a class solution template for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using plan analysis software. VMAT is a development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with potential advantages for the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer. Class solutions are i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.92-96
Hauptverfasser: Hoffmann, Matthew, Pacey, Jacqueline, Goodworth, Josie, Laszcyzk, Andrea, Ford, Richard, Chick, Brendon, Greenham, Stuart, Westhuyzen, Justin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess a class solution template for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using plan analysis software. VMAT is a development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with potential advantages for the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer. Class solutions are increasingly used for facilitating RT planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective tool for evaluating class solutions. The class solution for VMAT was based on the current static field IMRT template. The plans of 77 prostate cancer patients were evaluated using a set of in-house plan quality metrics (scores) (PlanIQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). The metrics compared the class solution for VMAT planning with the IMRT template and the delivered clinical plan (CP). Eight metrics were associated with target coverage and ten with organs-at-risk (OAR). Individual metrics were summed and the combined scores were subjected to non-parametric analysis. The low-dose wash for both static IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated using 40Gy and 25Gy isodose volumes. VMAT plans were of equal or better quality than the IMRT template and CP for target coverage (combined score) and OAR combined score. The 40Gy isodose volume was marginally higher with VMAT than IMRT (4.9%) but lower than CP (−6.6%)(P=0.0074). The 25Gy volume was significantly lower with VMAT than both IMRT (−32.7%) and CP (−34.4%)(P
ISSN:1507-1367
2083-4640
DOI:10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.009