Fast‐acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in the setting of insulin degludec‐treated type 1 diabetes: Efficacy and safety from a randomized double‐blind trial

Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mealtime or post‐meal fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs mealtime insulin aspart (IAsp), both in combination with insulin degludec, in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods This multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial (Clinical trial regist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2018-12, Vol.20 (12), p.2885-2893
Hauptverfasser: Buse, John B., Carlson, Anders L., Komatsu, Mitsuhisa, Mosenzon, Ofri, Rose, Ludger, Liang, Bo, Buchholtz, Kristine, Horio, Hiroshi, Kadowaki, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mealtime or post‐meal fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs mealtime insulin aspart (IAsp), both in combination with insulin degludec, in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods This multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial (Clinical trial registry: NCT02500706, ClinicalTrials.gov) randomized participants to double‐blind mealtime faster aspart (n = 342) or IAsp (n = 342) or open‐label post‐meal faster aspart (n = 341). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c 26 weeks post randomization. All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used for evaluation of the effect. Results Non‐inferiority for the change from baseline in HbA1c was confirmed for mealtime and post‐meal faster aspart vs IAsp (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: 95%CI, −0.02% [−0.11; 0.07] and 0.10% [0.004; 0.19], respectively). Mealtime faster aspart was superior to IAsp for 1‐hour PPG increment using a meal test (ETD, −0.90 mmol/L [−1.36; –0.45]; P 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13545