Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use”
Abstract The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Admin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of family medicine 2018-11, Vol.16 (6), p.552-554 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 554 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 552 |
| container_title | Annals of family medicine |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA Benjamin, John, MD Jardeleza, Timothy, MD Bergstrom, Curt, MD Cronin, William, MD Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD |
| description | Abstract The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our study compared oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) in patients from 1 medical use (MU) pulse oximeter to 8 NMU pulse oximeters. Measured arterial oxygenation (SaO2 ) was compared with SpO2 when available. In patients who were normoxic (SpO2 ≥90%), all oximeters exhibited similar readings. This finding suggests that NMU pulse oximeters may be able to rule out hypoxemia in clinical settings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1370/afm.2317 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6231944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629315204</galeid><els_id>1_s2_0_S1544170919300642</els_id><sourcerecordid>A629315204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-fb801cfe27bd572c4e1908ca2df1d74099ad7e0844073dca97cd4e2dab03020f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkt9qFDEUxoMotlbBJ5ABQbzZevJnJzs3Qln8U1htQYuXIZOcdFMzkzWZKfauD6Iv1ycxY9e1vUrg_PLlnO87hDyncEi5hDfadYeMU_mA7NO5EDMqqXy4u0OzR57kfAHAKOPsMdnjIBhwyfbJt2XwvTc6VMf9gGmTcNCDj30VXXWKyW_WmErxdAwZq5OfvsNC5WqlWwxoq5vrX5_jULmYqk9o_-qcZby5_v2UPHK6vHm2PQ_I2ft3X5cfZ6uTD8fLo9XMiEU9zFy7AGocMtnauWRGIG1gYTSzjlopoGm0lQgLIUBya3QjjRXIrG6BAwPHD8jbW93N2HZoDfZD6Vdtku90ulJRe3W_0vu1Oo-Xqi5-NUIUgddbgRR_jJgH1flsMATdYxyzYpQzyeu5lAV9eYue64DK9y4WRTPh6qhmDadzBpPgqzvUGnUY1jmGcXI13we3P5sUc07odl1TUFOsqsSqplgL-uLulDvwX47_bcDi9aXHpMw21-94hfkijqkvMSiqMlOgvkybMS0GbThALRj_A2NEs2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132736577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use”</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA ; Benjamin, John, MD ; Jardeleza, Timothy, MD ; Bergstrom, Curt, MD ; Cronin, William, MD ; Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS ; Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA ; Benjamin, John, MD ; Jardeleza, Timothy, MD ; Bergstrom, Curt, MD ; Cronin, William, MD ; Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS ; Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our study compared oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) in patients from 1 medical use (MU) pulse oximeter to 8 NMU pulse oximeters. Measured arterial oxygenation (SaO2 ) was compared with SpO2 when available. In patients who were normoxic (SpO2 ≥90%), all oximeters exhibited similar readings. This finding suggests that NMU pulse oximeters may be able to rule out hypoxemia in clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1370/afm.2317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30420372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Annals of Family Medicine</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Family Medicine/General Medicine ; Internal Medicine ; Licensing, certification and accreditation ; Pulse oximeters ; Research Briefs</subject><ispartof>Annals of family medicine, 2018-11, Vol.16 (6), p.552-554</ispartof><rights>Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Annals of Family Medicine</rights><rights>2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-fb801cfe27bd572c4e1908ca2df1d74099ad7e0844073dca97cd4e2dab03020f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231944/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231944/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, John, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Timothy, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, Curt, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, William, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use”</title><title>Annals of family medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our study compared oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) in patients from 1 medical use (MU) pulse oximeter to 8 NMU pulse oximeters. Measured arterial oxygenation (SaO2 ) was compared with SpO2 when available. In patients who were normoxic (SpO2 ≥90%), all oximeters exhibited similar readings. This finding suggests that NMU pulse oximeters may be able to rule out hypoxemia in clinical settings.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Family Medicine/General Medicine</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Licensing, certification and accreditation</subject><subject>Pulse oximeters</subject><subject>Research Briefs</subject><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkt9qFDEUxoMotlbBJ5ABQbzZevJnJzs3Qln8U1htQYuXIZOcdFMzkzWZKfauD6Iv1ycxY9e1vUrg_PLlnO87hDyncEi5hDfadYeMU_mA7NO5EDMqqXy4u0OzR57kfAHAKOPsMdnjIBhwyfbJt2XwvTc6VMf9gGmTcNCDj30VXXWKyW_WmErxdAwZq5OfvsNC5WqlWwxoq5vrX5_jULmYqk9o_-qcZby5_v2UPHK6vHm2PQ_I2ft3X5cfZ6uTD8fLo9XMiEU9zFy7AGocMtnauWRGIG1gYTSzjlopoGm0lQgLIUBya3QjjRXIrG6BAwPHD8jbW93N2HZoDfZD6Vdtku90ulJRe3W_0vu1Oo-Xqi5-NUIUgddbgRR_jJgH1flsMATdYxyzYpQzyeu5lAV9eYue64DK9y4WRTPh6qhmDadzBpPgqzvUGnUY1jmGcXI13we3P5sUc07odl1TUFOsqsSqplgL-uLulDvwX47_bcDi9aXHpMw21-94hfkijqkvMSiqMlOgvkybMS0GbThALRj_A2NEs2A</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA</creator><creator>Benjamin, John, MD</creator><creator>Jardeleza, Timothy, MD</creator><creator>Bergstrom, Curt, MD</creator><creator>Cronin, William, MD</creator><creator>Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS</creator><creator>Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</creator><general>Annals of Family Medicine</general><general>American Academy of Family Physicians</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use”</title><author>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA ; Benjamin, John, MD ; Jardeleza, Timothy, MD ; Bergstrom, Curt, MD ; Cronin, William, MD ; Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS ; Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-fb801cfe27bd572c4e1908ca2df1d74099ad7e0844073dca97cd4e2dab03020f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Family Medicine/General Medicine</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Licensing, certification and accreditation</topic><topic>Pulse oximeters</topic><topic>Research Briefs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, John, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Timothy, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, Curt, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, William, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudson, Arlene J., MD, MA</au><au>Benjamin, John, MD</au><au>Jardeleza, Timothy, MD</au><au>Bergstrom, Curt, MD</au><au>Cronin, William, MD</au><au>Mendoza, Mario, MD, MS</au><au>Schultheis, Lex, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use”</atitle><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>552-554</pages><issn>1544-1709</issn><eissn>1544-1717</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our study compared oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) in patients from 1 medical use (MU) pulse oximeter to 8 NMU pulse oximeters. Measured arterial oxygenation (SaO2 ) was compared with SpO2 when available. In patients who were normoxic (SpO2 ≥90%), all oximeters exhibited similar readings. This finding suggests that NMU pulse oximeters may be able to rule out hypoxemia in clinical settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Annals of Family Medicine</pub><pmid>30420372</pmid><doi>10.1370/afm.2317</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1544-1709 |
| ispartof | Annals of family medicine, 2018-11, Vol.16 (6), p.552-554 |
| issn | 1544-1709 1544-1717 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6231944 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Comparative analysis Family Medicine/General Medicine Internal Medicine Licensing, certification and accreditation Pulse oximeters Research Briefs |
| title | Clinical Interpretation of Peripheral Pulse Oximeters Labeled “Not for Medical Use” |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A07%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Interpretation%20of%20Peripheral%20Pulse%20Oximeters%20Labeled%20%E2%80%9CNot%20for%20Medical%20Use%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20family%20medicine&rft.au=Hudson,%20Arlene%20J.,%20MD,%20MA&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=552-554&rft.issn=1544-1709&rft.eissn=1544-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1370/afm.2317&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA629315204%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132736577&rft_id=info:pmid/30420372&rft_galeid=A629315204&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1544170919300642&rfr_iscdi=true |