Hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and zero or one mutant allele of SLC26A4

Objectives/Hypothesis To characterize the severity and natural history of hearing loss, and the prevalence of having a cochlear implant in a maturing cohort of individuals with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and zero or one mutant allele of SLC26A4. Study Design Prospective cohort study of subje...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2017-07, Vol.127 (7), p.E238-E243
Hauptverfasser: Rose, Jane, Muskett, Julie A., King, Kelly A., Zalewski, Christopher K., Chattaraj, Parna, Butman, John A., Kenna, Margaret A., Chien, Wade W., Brewer, Carmen C., Griffith, Andrew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis To characterize the severity and natural history of hearing loss, and the prevalence of having a cochlear implant in a maturing cohort of individuals with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and zero or one mutant allele of SLC26A4. Study Design Prospective cohort study of subjects ascertained between 1998 and 2015 at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Methods Study subjects were 127 individuals (median age, 8 years; range, 0–59 years) with EVA in at least one ear. Results Ears with EVA and zero or one mutant allele of SLC26A4 had mean 0.5/1/2/4‐kHz pure‐tone averages of 62.6 and 52.9 dB HL, respectively, in contrast to EVA ears with two mutant alleles of SLC26A4 (88.1 dB HL; P < .01). This association was independent of age, sex, or side of EVA (P < .001). Natural history of hearing loss was not associated with number of mutant alleles (P = .94). The prevalence of having a cochlear implant was nine (12%) of 76, two (13%) of 15, and 12 (38%) of 32 subjects with zero, one, and two mutant alleles, respectively (P = .00833). This association was not independent (P = .534) but reflected underlying correlations with age at time of first audiogram (P = .003) or severity of hearing loss (P = .000). Conclusions Ears with EVA and zero or one mutant allele of SLC26A4 have less severe hearing loss, no difference in prevalence of fluctuation, and a lower prevalence of cochlear implantation in comparison to ears with two mutant alleles of SLC26A4. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 127:E238–E243, 2017
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.26418