Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3

Purpose To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks. Methods Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2018-11, Vol.256 (11), p.2069-2073
Hauptverfasser: Baumgarten, Sabine, Schiller, Petra, Hellmich, Martin, Walter, Peter, Agostini, Hansjürgen, Junker, Bernd, Helbig, Horst, Lommatzsch, Albrecht, Mazinani, Babac
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks. Methods Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1), or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C), or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). The primary endpoint was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the review period of 6 months. One hundred out of 257 patients were identified with inferior breaks and 63 patients had 4 or more breaks. Results In patients with retinal breaks between 5:00 and 7:00, treatment was successful in 77.4% (24/31, treatment arm E1) versus 57.1% (16/28, treatment arm C) ( p  = 0.301, odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 7.17). In patients with multiple breaks, success rates were 68.2% (15/22, E1) versus. 72.4% (21/29, C, p  = 0.46, OR 0.52, CI 0.08–3.65). Conclusion Combining an encircling band with vitrectomy in patients with pseudophakic retinal detachment and inferior or multiple breaks does not significantly improve primary anatomical success in comparison to treatment with 20 G or 23/25 G vitrectomy alone.
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-018-4106-6