The effectiveness and safety of the RESTORE ® drug-eluting balloon versus a drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: study protocol for a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial

Small coronary vessel disease (disease affecting coronary vessels with main branch diameters of ≤ 2.75 mm) is a common and intractable problem in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study was designed to test the theory that the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting balloons for the tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC 2018-07, Vol.15 (7), p.469-475
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Yi-Da, Qiao, Shu-Bin, Su, Xi, Chen, Yun-Dai, Jin, Ze-Ning, Chen, Hui, Xu, Biao, Kong, Xiang-Qing, Pang, Wen-Yue, Liu, Yong, Yu, Zai-Xin, Li, Xue, Li, Hui, Zhao, Yan-Yan, Li, Wei, Tian, Jian, Guan, Chang-Dong, Xu, Bo, Gao, Run-Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Small coronary vessel disease (disease affecting coronary vessels with main branch diameters of ≤ 2.75 mm) is a common and intractable problem in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study was designed to test the theory that the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of lesions in small coronary vessels are non-inferior to those of drug-eluting stents. We designed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial aiming to assess the effectiveness and safety of the RESTORE (Cardionovum, Bonn, Germany) drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus the RESOLUTE (Medtronic, USA) drug-eluting stent (DES) in the treatment of small coronary vessel disease. This trial started in August 2016. A total of 230 patients with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.25 mm and ≤ 2.75 mm were randomly assigned to treatment with a DEB or a DES at a 1:1 ratio. The study was also designed to enroll 30 patients with an RVD ≥ 2.00 mm and ≤ 2.25 mm in the tiny vessel cohort. The key baseline data include demographic characteristics, relative medical history, baseline angiographic values and baseline procedural characteristics. The primary endpoint is in-segment diameter stenosis at nine months after the index procedure. Secondary endpoints include acute success, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis. The study will evaluate the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of DEBs compared to DESs in the treatment of coronary artery lesions in small vessels.
ISSN:1671-5411
DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.07.006