Variable impact of CSF flow suppression on quantitative 3.0T intracranial vessel wall measurements
Background Flow suppression techniques have been developed for intracranial (IC) vessel wall imaging (VWI) and optimized using simulations; however, simulation results may not translate in vivo. Purpose To evaluate experimentally how IC vessel wall and lumen measurements change in identical subjects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2018-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1120-1128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Flow suppression techniques have been developed for intracranial (IC) vessel wall imaging (VWI) and optimized using simulations; however, simulation results may not translate in vivo.
Purpose
To evaluate experimentally how IC vessel wall and lumen measurements change in identical subjects when evaluated using the most commonly available blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow suppression modules and VWI sequences.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population/Subjects
Healthy adults (n = 13; age = 37 ± 15 years) were enrolled.
Field Strength/Sequence
A 3.0T 3D T1/proton density (PD)‐weighted turbo‐spin‐echo (TSE) acquisition with post‐readout anti‐driven equilibrium module, with and without Delay‐Alternating‐with‐Nutation‐for‐Tailored‐Excitation (DANTE) was applied. DANTE flip angle (8–12°) and TSE refocusing angle (sweep = 40–120° or 50–120°) were varied.
Assessment
Basilar artery and internal carotid artery (ICA) wall thicknesses, CSF signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and signal ratio (SR) were assessed. Measurements were made by two readers (radiology resident and board‐certified neuroradiologist).
Statistical Tests
A Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was applied with corrected two‐sided P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.26028 |