Evaluation of post-puncture bleeding time of arteriovenous fistulas with IRIS® bandage

Our aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the IRIS® bandage (Nephrokit®) on post-puncture bleeding compared to conventional manual compression. Sixty-four patients, hemodialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula, were enrolled in a 3-week prospective study. Conventional manual compression...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2014-03, Vol.15 (2), p.102-107
Hauptverfasser: Boulanger, Henri, Ahriz-Saksi, Salima, Flamant, Martin, Vigeral, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the IRIS® bandage (Nephrokit®) on post-puncture bleeding compared to conventional manual compression. Sixty-four patients, hemodialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula, were enrolled in a 3-week prospective study. Conventional manual compression was used during the first week, the IRIS® bandage during the second week and conventional manual compression again during the third week. The outcomes analyzed were the persistence or absence of bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture with IRIS® device compared to conventional manual compression. The safety of the IRIS® bandage was also evaluated. Rates of persistent bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture at arterial sites were 53±6% and 56±5%, respectively, during the first and third weeks (conventional compression) versus 18±5% during the second week (IRIS® bandage). Similarly, rates of persistent bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture at venous sites were 45±6% and 45±6%, respectively, with conventional compression versus 23±5% with the IRIS® bandage. The difference between the IRIS® device and conventional compression therefore proved highly statistically significant (p
ISSN:1129-7298
1724-6032
DOI:10.5301/jva.5000176