Rapid incremental closed traction reduction of cervical facet fracture dislocation: the Stoke Mandeville experience

Study design Retrospective case series study. Objective To determine the success rate and neurological outcomes of rapid incremental closed traction reduction (RICTR) of cervical dislocations with spinal cord compression in the National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC), between June 2006 and December 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spinal cord series and cases 2018-09, Vol.4 (1), p.86-8, Article 86
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Wail A., Naidoo, Anitha, Belci, Maurizio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study design Retrospective case series study. Objective To determine the success rate and neurological outcomes of rapid incremental closed traction reduction (RICTR) of cervical dislocations with spinal cord compression in the National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC), between June 2006 and December 2011. Setting Tertiary spinal injuries centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, UK. Methods A list of cervical trauma patients who were admitted to NSIC between January 2006 and December 2011 was retrieved from the hospital's electronic records, consultant and admission logbooks. Patients, admitted within 7 days of cervical facet dislocation and spinal cord injury (SCI), were included. Retrospective data collection and analysis was done using a data collection form and an Excel spreadsheet. Results Seventeen patients have met the eligibility criteria of the study. One patient was excluded because he only had nerve root symptoms. The procedure was successful in 44% of the cases. Eighty-six percent of patients in the successful RICTR group improved in their discharge motor index score (MIS), whereas 43% improved in their post-reduction MIS. Overall, 81% of the cohort had improvements in their discharge MIS. Conclusion Our RICTR success rate was low compared to the reported average success rate in the literature, likely due to delays in admission. Neurological outcomes were favourable in the majority of patients at discharge. In our opinion, early admission and RICTR attempts could have improved the results and therefore we would recommend that RICTR procedures are done for suitable patients in the Emergency Departments of Major Trauma Centres (MTC).
ISSN:2058-6124
2058-6124
DOI:10.1038/s41394-018-0109-0