Results of Posterior Vertebral Column Resection: Surgical Modification of Suk Technique

Study Design: Consecutive, retrospective review. Objectives: To evaluate and report a modified posterior vertebral column technique. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. Patients having severe 3-dimensional deformity with flexibility less than 20% and managed by posterior ver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global spine journal 2018-08, Vol.8 (5), p.478-482
Hauptverfasser: Aydinli, Ufuk, Kara, Kursat, Mutlu, Muren, Yaray, Osman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study Design: Consecutive, retrospective review. Objectives: To evaluate and report a modified posterior vertebral column technique. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. Patients having severe 3-dimensional deformity with flexibility less than 20% and managed by posterior vertebral body resection (PVCR) between 2011 and 2014 were included in this study. There were 12 female and 8 male patients, with a mean age of 18 year (range = 3-63 years). Results: The average follow-up was 3.5 years (2-5 years). The preoperative coronal plane deformity was 84° (70° to 120°) and corrected to 42° (28° to 68°), showing 60% scoliosis correction. Average preoperative local kyphotic angle was 92° (82° to 110°). Correction rate for kyphosis was 62%. All patients after surgery showed their baseline neurological status, and no complications were encountered. The mean estimated blood loss was 1072 mL (350-2000 mL). Thirty-nine percent (33% to 50%) of total blood loss occurred after vertebral body resection, and 61% (50% to 67%) blood loss occurred after the removal of posterior elements. The ratio of estimated blood loss to estimated body blood volume was 26% (range = 19% to 52%). Conclusion: We found that 60% of total bleeding occurs during and after posterior bone resection. Spinal cord is open to possible iatrogenic direct spinal cord injury with surgical instruments for a much shorter period of time compared with the original technique.
ISSN:2192-5682
2192-5690
DOI:10.1177/2192568217739854