Breast cancer survival in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa: A receptor-defined cohort of women diagnosed from 2009 to 11

•Few studies have examined breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa.•We studied time to death or terminal illness in a historical breast cancer cohort.•Despite considerable losses to follow-up, estimated 3-year survival was 72%.•Survival was better in early stage and ER-positive tumours.•Early d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology 2018-02, Vol.52, p.120-127
Hauptverfasser: Cubasch, Herbert, Dickens, Caroline, Joffe, Maureen, Duarte, Raquel, Murugan, Nivashni, Tsai Chih, Ming, Moodley, Kiashanee, Sharma, Vinay, Ayeni, Oluwatosin, Jacobson, Judith S., Neugut, Alfred I, McCormack, Valerie, Ruff, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Few studies have examined breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa.•We studied time to death or terminal illness in a historical breast cancer cohort.•Despite considerable losses to follow-up, estimated 3-year survival was 72%.•Survival was better in early stage and ER-positive tumours.•Early diagnosis and treatment has the potential to improve survival in this setting. South Africa’s public healthcare system is better equipped to manage breast cancer than most other SSA countries, but survival rates are unknown. A historical cohort of 602 women newly diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma during 2009–2011 at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Soweto, Johannesburg, was followed using health systems data to December 2014. ‘Overall survival’ time was defined from diagnosis to death or terminal illness. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) associated with woman and tumour characteristics. During a median 2.1 years follow-up (IQR 0.5–3.8), 149 women died or were classified terminally ill; 287 were lost-to-follow-up. 3-year survival was 84% for early stage (I/II) and 56% for late stage (III/IV) tumours (late v early: HR 2.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9–4.1), however the 42% cumulative losses to follow-up over this period were greater for late stage, half of which occurred within 6 months of diagnosis. After mutual adjustment for stage, grade, age, receptor subtype and HIV status, lower survival was also associated with triple negative (HR 3.1 (95% CI: 1.9–5.0)) and HER2-enriched (2.5 (95% CI: 1.4–4.5)) compared to ER/PR+ HER2- tumours, but not with age or HIV-infection (1.4 (95% CI: 0.8, 2.3)). In this South African cohort, breast cancer survival is suboptimal, but was better for early stage and hormone receptor-positive tumours. Efforts to reduce clinic losses in the immediate post-diagnosis period, in addition to early presentation and accelerated diagnosis and treatment, are needed to prevent breast cancer deaths, and survival improvements need to be monitored using prospective studies with active follow-up.
ISSN:1877-7821
1877-783X
DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.007